The design of Jackpot V2 looks nothing like flight hardware.
But I think Jeff is relating a lesson I have to think about all the time: perfect is the enemy of good enough.
I don’t mind Jeff pointing it out, because I certainly do spend time in a world where we’ll spend an extra $100,000 per system to take a working design and make it just a little bit closer to ‘perfect’.
This is very true.
But, Jackpot V2 is an integrated board- so you want to at least try and avoid someone ruining a $75 or $100 board because they did a common thing like plug in a pendant connector that they handled with their thumb or accidentally unplugged or plugged in at the wrong time.
In the ecosystem, the other sibling board designers have reported they get notably less returns with their admittedly non-ideal protections. That’s probably the right level of effort, and Ryan working to make his board just a bit better is typical Ryan.
What I’ve seen in the thread above for the new design looks like it’s going to be the right compromise between perfect (Impossible) and nothing at all. Said differently, good enough. I think the Jackpot V2 is going to prove to be better than good enough. That’s what Ryan has said he’s shooting for- and I think he’s got it.
Yes, this. What Ryan’s designed above doesn’t look utterly ridiculous to me and in fact looks reasonably good for an inexpensive design.
It’s got a reasonable ESD protection, series protection resistors, an appropriate looking amount of capacitance in the right places for the interface.
It doesn’t look like it will cause problems for a 1Mbps serial interface, and it shouldn’t get in the way of using the expansion header in the normal way.
I’m chomping at the bit to get my hands on this next iteration and put it through its paces.
Hook it up to M5 and CYD pendants, an Airedale, a 0-10V spindle expansion module, and whatever else I can dream up to trial run with it.