My table is heavily inspired by @Neilp’s The ‘Black and Blue’ LR3 build. Some errors were made on sizing the table (misread the tube lengths for table dimensions), which is the reason for the smaller addition on the framing.
Will be starting my own soon and plan a very similar table, except I think I need mine to be extendable.
I need a full sheet table, but I only have 8’ ceilings, so contemplating how to make a foldable table where it’s only full sheet “when necessary”.
I have nearly made the same mistake a few times. I wish the calculator was a little more compact, or at least, that the table size was at the top since, for me, the table size constraints are the most important thing to watch while playing with the calculator numbers
Yea only realized the mistake when I went back to the calculator to get my tube lengths and realized they were the same dimensions I’d just made the table . So, spent today adding 3" of length and 7" of width to the table. Should give me a 4’x5’ cutting area, and still barely fits under the shelving in my garage when raised.
I considered that first, but I’m not sure it’s going to work in the space I have (Electric panel, etc. is on the wall that it would hide).
I was settled on attempting to build a table like this, as tall as would fit, that would have an additional hinged extension that could fold out from underneath when necessary, so it would be 4’ x 6.5’-ish most of the time, and the extension could fold out and the belts moved and turn into a 4’ x 8’.
But for now, just going 4’ x 5’ stationary table and I’ll solve that problem later…
My experience is, do not try this without the struts. (Don’t ask me how I know lol)
You are better off shimming your workpiece level to get the struts cut and machine finalized, then square everything, then worry about surfacing, etc.
Those struts add a lot of rigidity to machine.
Attempting to surface it without the struts can cause the X Gantry to dip from the weight of the router, and then you’ll just have a dip in the opposite direction.