LR3 in the High Desert

This could be the issue. The 2815s are wired the exact same way with no flickering or data issues, but I suppose it’s entirely possible the 2811s are different enough that this matters. I’ll double-check all the wiring connections as you suggest, too. I am almost positive the PSU connections themselves are fine, I was careful to clamp the spade connectors tightly, but it’s possible there is a connection issue somewhere in the Wagos.

The data cables are no more than 16" long as a very conservative guess.

Here is an informative video about pixels flickering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ttEAyiyTAI

Grab a beer (or two) and watch :grinning:

2 Likes

Common ground was the issue! First thing I tried was connecting one of the ground pins to the 12V ground Wago, and now the bottom LEDs are rock steady. Thanks for all the help!

4 Likes

Aaaaand we’re back down on the ground! Once I’m sure about the code Estlcam is creating, I’ll make a new crown file and draw it tomorrow.

9 Likes

Looking awesome man!

2 Likes

Wow! Impressive!

Jackpot crown test complete!

Tomorrow I will run a square test and try a foam cut or two to make sure things are working well while cutting. If that goes well, I will start preparing to cut the torsion box!

9 Likes

Congrats on the crown!

2 Likes

I uploaded some of models I have designed for my LowRider.

Vacuum hose adapters:
https://www.printables.com/model/643197-lowrider-3-vacuum-dust-collection-adapters

Electronics (Jackput & PSU) mounts:
https://www.printables.com/model/643298-lowrider-3-internal-electronics-mounts/files

Wago mount for LED wiring:
https://www.printables.com/model/643313-lowrider-3-wago-plate-for-led-wiring

4 Likes

Nice! Thanks!

1 Like

First cuts in plywood! Testing tolerances for the torsion box. Currently cutting with a 1/4" compression bit. I really like how the samples came out!

Query: should the joints be a pretty tight press fit? Or does it not matter once the top and bottom skins are glued and screwed? There is just a little bit of wiggle room in my cuts at the moment.

3 Likes

I tried for a tight press fit. But they ended up with a little wiggle room. I only have a couple of clamps, so when I glued them I put a screw in the middle of the X in a predrilled hole. The screw was long enough to pull the two pieces together and the predrilled hole was sized to wedge out the plywood just a little so the surfaces made good contact.

Full disclosure: I know nothing about woodworking.

3 Likes

A very informative evening in the workshop!

I managed to cut two parametric table spars. There were some missed steps on the other two, including the ever-fun wandering bit. I ended up taking the core off to double-check the X motor grub screws. They were fine and Loctited, so I put the core back on and made sure the bearings were appropriately snug - I think the core might have been a little loose on the gantry. I also ended up boosting the endmill RPMs by a couple thousand, which I suspect might have been what actually resolved my problems.

Out of curiosity, this is a photo of the kind of chips the router is producing. Based on calculations (assuming I’m interpreting how chipload is supposed to work), I think I had close to the right combo of DOC, feedrate, and RPMs… but from reading other threads, it seems that a visual verification helps with making adjustments. So, if anyone wants to chime in and tell me how poor my setting choices are, I’m all ears for learning! :rofl:

Currently using a 1/4" 2-flute compression bit with a pretty sizeable upcut section, so:
Depth per pass: 8mm - I know, pretty aggressive;
Feedrate: 35mm/s
RPM: ~20000

This did give me two very nice spars, though, so these settings can’t be TOO far off…

1 Like

What is the recommended first pass DOC and chipload from the endmill manufacturer?

1 Like

The manufacturer says 260 inch/min, .25" (6.35mm) stepdown, .1" (2.54mm) stepover for the 1/4" (6.35mm) compression bit, and to reduce feedrate for a depth of cut greater than the bit diameter - 3x bit diameter = 50% feedrate. Unless I am mistaken, 260 in/min is something like 90mm/sec.

2 Likes

Good enough for mental math. All mighty calculator says 110.067 mm/sec.

I need to check my drivers. I’m not exceeding 20mm/sec on deep cuts, yet alone 8mm.

This is what I have seen and somewhat of produced. I have seen bigger. But only on YouTube.

1 Like

I think you’re moving too fast, if I look online, it recommends about 21mm/s at that rpm for ply, assuming 6.35mm DOC. That lands you around .013 for your chipload.

1 Like

Entirely possible. I will try some slower cuts this evening to see what happens.

What calculator(s) are you guys using? Now that I’m starting to cut, I’d like to have some reference numbers of my own.

1 Like

If I don’t know the formula, google
If I do phone or mental

MM/Min to MM/Sec is divide by 60

2 Likes

This is what I was using: Chipload Calculator | GDP Tooling

2 Likes