Looks like the “2d” califlower is now a subscription based item. No mention of the 3D version. https://youtu.be/ySCbNEESR2g?si=xq5kSSnpVysS_kU8
We can find another skew solution for those that want near perfection.
1 Like
How much time did it add to do the color changes?
Another subscription based model… it is a nice tool, but for something like this it should just be “buy once, own it forever” in my opinion
2 Likes
Michigan 
3:23 vs 3:47 on the Prusa MK4 with 0.32 layer height, 50 tool changes.
1 Like
I feel like you could draw something for us in minutes
2 Likes
I have a skew test part I published a while back. I just never added a spreadsheet to go with it. Back then we just adjusted the machine not the software.
2 Likes
This is not quite correct, the consumer can actually decide whether the product is repaired or a replacement product is supplied. §439 Section 1 BGB
It is also good for the consumer that the burden of proof has changed, in the first 12 months the seller must prove that you have used the product incorrectly.
In addition, the seller would have to pay for the costs of return transportation. This is particularly funny if you bought something in a store far away, the seller would have to pay for your journey. §439 Section 2 BGB
But I don’t want to digress too far off-topic now
2 Likes
Oh, this changed three years ago. Damn.
1 Like
@vicious1 with 0.6 nozzle do I need always 3 walls or I can reduce them to 2? Cause 3 walls at 0.6 increase the weight of the part noticeably…
1 Like
Short: 
Long: AFAIK, none of the Beta folks extensively tested 2 walls versus 3 walls. Personally recommend 3 walls even if using 0.6mm since that’s what most Beta testers used, they seem happy.
More walls does mean paying more attention to dialing in extrusion flow. Personally have been slightly over extruding which causes holes and nut recesses to be a bit tight, and caused fit issues early on, but my based on no data hope was that slightly overextruded walls/segments are better bonded/adhered .
1 Like
I actually did! I shimmed the printer with one and one layer of aluminium foil under one side of the extrusion foot until it was square. Super janky
3 Likes
I’ve seen diffent test about infills, and seems that gyroid is one of the best for strength and the best for strength/weight ratio.
It doesn’t draw crosspaths like Cubic, so this will be better if over extruded, and it has a better strength on all axis… someone of the beta test team tested it?
I use it on 3D printed planes, and even with ultralight structures (foaming PLA, 1wall, 3% infill) feels really solid in all directions
1 Like
Gyroid is only tested to be stronger in compression, the least of any parts usefulness.
You can use any wall count you want I suggest 3 or less, more you can cause bridging issues.
2 Likes
It is hard to generalize walls and infill. There are many ways to stress a part.
You can do anything you like. If you are comfortable doing your own thing, just scrub through your sliced part to see how the internal features look to you.
I add suggestions for printing parts for people new to 3D printing, there are no hard fast rules, but my suggestions should get a new user good parts.
5 Likes
Hmmm, my experience is that shipping within Canada, or to other countries outside of Canada, is MUCH more expensive than shipping within the US or shipping from the US to other countries.
Taxes, employee expenses (with the exception of medical insurance, offset by higher taxes) and living expenses are somewhat more here than in the US as well. You would probably need to make more $$$ to cover the difference in exchange rates as well
Mexico? Possibly more feasible…
WHAT???
Wait. They will deliver the boxes to you??? I need to look into this 
Not much, im using the bambu at the shop with the ams feeder. I’ll run it again on the software and see, I’m guessing maybe an hour. I had a 2 tone core idea and it added an entire day… so that’s not going to happen :laugh:
1 Like