In hopes of adding another output pin to the Jackpot2, the config files will be different. So to make future support easier I am bumping the release number. Continued from here, Jackpot V2 - #687 by vicious1 Jackpot3 Specs to follow.

[image] Ryan: 5v/24v output selection needs to be pwm capable. Looks like the Corgi is also dual voltage. I wish I would have noticed this sooner… [image] He does not even have a selection jumper or switch both circuits are always active. Feels weird like it could interfere with the signal…

Okay, I can’t wrap my head around the high side switching with a p-channel. I think I get it, but not confident enough. A few days of reading in circles is enough. Back to the proven low side switching from the JP1. I feel like I understand it but from what I am seeing I do not understand why the JP…

New problem, no room for all the extra terminals.

It MIGHT be possible to get a 4th of the current gray block, but 4 more on top of that can’t happen and still fit a module. I have been digging through all the different connectors I have around here, on all the random boards I have, modules, LCSC. I do not want to make the board larger. These sor…

I need to make the 4 outputs switchable. High side switching of the 24v would mean a common ground and only one wire would have to be switched (5v signal / 24v signal) same ground. The low side switch means both + & - need to be changed. So back to p-channel or other high side switching. That is th…

[image] IOS discord forum issues essentially what we’d been kicking around in the V2 thread. I didn’t think we could have two live circuits like that. Seems like odd things could happen. I am getting closer to the high side stuff. Just need the reason to spend more time on it.

[image] vicious1: I didn’t think we could have two live circuits like that. You mean a single gpio driving multiple different circuit elements? No problem as long as you understand the requirements of each leg and she underlying interface requirements for each side and for a generic pin like…

[image] Ryan: I do not want to make the board larger. I don’t think that’s a problem as long as it fits instead the beam. :slightly_smiling_face:

[image] Tokoloshe: as long as it fits instead the beam I keep asking this out of context - why does it have to be in the beam? Is it valid to question why we don’t move all of the bits back to a box on/under the table?

I’m on board with you here (pun intended) If it fits inside the beam it can also fit in a box though, whereas the opposite is not guaranteed So maybe it’s a good thing to take this as a constraint and let the user choose?

V1E.com Forum

Jackpot3

Software / Firmware Jackpot Board / FluidNC

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled