Just a couple of notes about my old LR3’s usable X width (cuttable area) and my new LR4’s usable X width.
My prior machine (LR3) had stainless steel tubes that were 1435 mm long, and on its non-rail side it rode so far out that its 608 roller bearing was almost off my Unistrut. It had an amazing X-travel distance of 1250 mm (49.2126"). But remember [for spoil board flattening], you always get to add the diameter of the cutting bit onto that travel distance to get your total actual cutting area (add the bit’s radius onto each side of the axis of travel). And remember that the bearing riding on that edge was less than ideal.
Since I never needed to cut anything wider than a 49" wide MDF sheet (for resurfacing a spoil board) and since when using, say, a 3/4" (19.05 mm) wide flattening bit, it meant I had a cuttable X width (LR3) of 1269.05 mm (that’s 1250 + 19.05) or 49.9626" (that’s 49.2126 + 0.75"). That’s literally wider than I ever needed, by almost an inch too much. Too wide, considering the bearing was almost off the edge. Having the machine built wider than it needs to be, is surrendering a bit of rigidity for no gain.
The good news is that I could correct all this on the LR4. The LR4 is slightly more compact (makes a bit more efficient use of space). It gains a little extra cutting width when compared to LR3. Anyhow, I did the math, and realized I could cut my (LR4) EMT steel tubes shorter than on LR3, and position my non-rail side’s YZ plate assembly fairly centered on the Unistrut, not sacrifice any more rigidity than necessary, and still be able to surface a 49" MDF sheet.
My LR4 EMT steel tubes are cut at 1398 mm long, and my printed table extenders (which I’m still prepping to test in cutting) are no wider than necessary, and I now have an X travel distance of 1230 (48.425"), which means, when using a 3/4" (19.05 mm) wide flattening bit, I have an X usable cutting width of 1249.05 mm (that’s 1230 + 19.05) or … wait for it … 49.175".
As far as aesthetics go, I like the look, because the Unistrut and the LR4’s printed YZ plate are almost exactly the same width. I measured just now using digital calipers, and the YZ plate is 42 mm wide, and my Unistrut is 41.7 mm wide. The plate rides aligned almost perfectly on top of the Unistrut.
To get the MDF spoil board of my full-sheet size torsion box to align with the new cuttable area, I will need to unscrew the spoil board, move it slightly, and re-screw it. No biggie.
To summarize, and I’m just refreshing my mind on these numbers, I reduced my tube length by 37 mm, yet only lost 20 mm on my actual X travel width. That means my Unistrut-mounted LR4 is 17 mm more efficient on X axis than LR3.