Anyone else have holding tabs that look like this?
Here are my settings in Estlcam
I use a flush trim bit on the router table to get the little nub off. No problem.
What I don’t like is the line that goes up the whole way. It’s like ~0.5-1mm deep. Not too big of a deal, as it sands off.
Its like the tool gets pulled towards the wood there when it lifts up to leave the tab? Can I improve this with a setting?
Is it deeper above the tab?
Yeah, the tab is 6mm. The workpiece is 18mm thick. Maybe this is a good thing to change. I only need ~3mm for the bearing of my flush bit. I was trying to make the tabs as short as possible so I only had a z movement for the last two passes (ex 3mm DOC). Maybe I should do it the other way around 18mm-3mm and leave it as a 15mm tab
Yes, doing a full depth finishing pass. 0.20mm allowance (1/8" endmill)
Hmm, maybe but I would expect my 5% round nose bit stepover to really show that and it is very consistent.
It did it with full depth tabs too. I’ll have to try and find a picture or run a test.
What depth of cut are you using in the picture? I don’t think you would see a difference in XY stepover. But if you took that cut in 5 passes, one of the sides would have steps going down.
Machine/bit flex, dull tool, deep cuts, fast X/Y, slow Z and possibly acceleration. The tool only moving in Z to plunge/retract releases the tension on the side of the tool and allows it to dig into the sidewall. I imagine there is also a divot at the path start/end point. Ramping the plunge helps to minimize the effect. Full tabs typically makes it worse, more pauses and Z only moves.
The picture shows the part function with a 1/8" endmill, 3mm DOC.
The round end nose bit comment was when I was doing the pocket on the inside (not shown). I was thinking if my Z wasn’t perpendicular, I would have higher ridges on one side. Sorry if my comment was confusing
I’m at the default 90*. I’ll try that next. What do you think, like 45*?
I use 30, but I think halving your DOC would be a better start.
Yup. Tried many things, but stiil had the marks. What i do now is leave less than .5mm on the bottom of piece with no tabs. Easily separate it with a razor knife then lightly sand the whole outer edge for a clean edge.
My two cents from what works for me.
Painters tape and CA glue and don’t use a holding tab at all. Or if I’m doing something bit I’ll shut off dust collection on the last pass. The dust in the grove will hold it from moving. Mostly I screw down where I can to not have to worry about it. I hate dealing with holding tabs. The flush trim bit on the router is a good idea though I’ll have to remember that next time
I do the same, I was sick of having to remove the tab marks and often having to remove quite a bit of the area around them… I have stopped using tabs in most cases, not worth the hassle.
I think this is due to deflection, either tool, belts, or machine in general. When you are cutting at a constant feed rate, the load is constant so the deflection is constant.
When you stop feeding to raise up for the tab, the load changes, and in the dwell time, the mill has more time to bite in (think “finishing pass” with federate of 0)
Try a triangular tab. This way the machine is still feeding in the x/y plane while the z moves occur. Keep the feed rates constant and you should be able to smooth out that area.
Probably, I have similar marks where the cut plunges into the wood when parting out something. I just don’t use holding tabs anymore
Has V11 got the same problem? I don’t remember having that happen.
At one point I had contemplated making a postprocessor that would detect holding tabs and move the cutter a tiny bit outward to avoid those marks. I don’t know of a solution.
That is a great idea, maybe Christian can build it into the software and remove the problem completely?
Estlcam 12 has the option to use rounded holding tabs that should not leave marks. You have to enable it individually on a per tool basis.
Also, using a rather large finishing pass with conventional milling (10%) nearly eliminates the burning.
